Lemberg Solutions vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) edges ahead of Endava (4.1/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for buyers who'd rather get specialist depth than giant-scale generalist capacity. Endava is the stronger option for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2000 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (additional offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 200+ | 11,300+ |
| Rating | 4.9 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Deep embedded and firmware engineering wrapped in a full cloud, data, and AI practice | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms |
| Pricing model | Flexible engagement models: tech consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, or full project development, rather than one fixed template | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | C/C++, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation & logistics | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail |
Lemberg Solutions vs Endava: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Next to the giants on this list, Lemberg Solutions is a small company: roughly 200 engineers, founded in Lviv in 2007, with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. What it offers instead of scale is depth in one area most generalist outsourcing giants don't staff for: embedded systems, firmware, electrical engineering, and hardware-adjacent product work, wrapped in a broader Cloud, Data & AI, and Digital practice. Clients include Astronics, Caltech, Ferno, Cellink, and Bosch Rexroth, backed by ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification and direct partnership tiers with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI/ML development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Team extension, Dedicated team, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy | Payments, Banking, Insurance |
| Best use cases | A connected medical device that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built together., An industrial IoT product needing MCU driver work and secure OTA firmware updates. | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Dedicated team |
Lemberg Solutions vs Endava: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Genuine embedded and firmware engineering depth that generalist giants on this list don't staff for. |
| + | 360° coverage from electronics through cloud and AI under one vendor. |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification, plus healthcare-specific delivery under IEC 62304 and FDA 21 CFR Part 820. |
| + | Direct partnership tiers with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip. |
| + | Full intellectual property and source code transfer on every engagement. |
| - | Not sized for a program that genuinely needs 500+ engineers staffed simultaneously across many parallel workstreams |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, only development and ongoing maintenance |
| - | Does not obtain regulatory certification on the client's behalf, only the technical documentation to support it |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a connected medical device that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built together.
Deep embedded and firmware engineering wrapped in a full cloud, data, and AI practice. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation & logistics.
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Endava (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A connected medical device that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built together. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An industrial IoT product needing MCU driver work and secure OTA firmware updates. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. Deep embedded and firmware engineering wrapped in a full cloud, data, and AI practice.
Endava (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. If your situation matches that, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Endava FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Endava?
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: genuine embedded and firmware engineering depth that generalist giants on this list don't staff for. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Endava differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses flexible engagement models: tech consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, or full project development, rather than one fixed template pricing. Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Endava?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Endava?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: deep embedded and firmware engineering wrapped in a full cloud, data, and AI practice. Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 11,300+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Automotive vs Payments, Banking).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.