Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (4.3/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for buyers who'd rather get specialist depth than giant-scale generalist capacity. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for enterprises wanting giant-scale delivery built on Eastern European engineering talent. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1993 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (additional offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA (large Ukraine delivery centers) |
| Team size | 200+ | 50,000+ globally; large Ukraine workforce |
| Rating | 4.9 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Deep embedded and firmware engineering wrapped in a full cloud, data, and AI practice | Publicly traded US scale built on a Central and Eastern European delivery model instead of the traditional offshore-India approach |
| Pricing model | Flexible engagement models: tech consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, or full project development, rather than one fixed template | Enterprise consulting and dedicated-team engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | C/C++, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | Java, Cloud platforms, Data engineering |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation & logistics | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Travel |
Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Next to the giants on this list, Lemberg Solutions is a small company: roughly 200 engineers, founded in Lviv in 2007, with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. What it offers instead of scale is depth in one area most generalist outsourcing giants don't staff for: embedded systems, firmware, electrical engineering, and hardware-adjacent product work, wrapped in a broader Cloud, Data & AI, and Digital practice. Clients include Astronics, Caltech, Ferno, Cellink, and Bosch Rexroth, backed by ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification and direct partnership tiers with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip.
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems was founded in 1993 and trades on the New York Stock Exchange, headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania, with more than 50,000 employees globally and a large Ukraine-based delivery workforce specifically. That's a different geographic bet than the India-anchored giants on this list: EPAM built its reputation on Central and Eastern European engineering talent rather than the traditional offshore-India model, giving it a distinct technical-culture reputation among the mega-scale vendors. Public-company scale still means formal enterprise sales cycles and account structures.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI/ML development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Team extension, Dedicated team, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A connected medical device that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built together., An industrial IoT product needing MCU driver work and secure OTA firmware updates. | An enterprise wanting giant-scale delivery capacity without the traditional offshore-India model., A buyer that wants a publicly traded, audited vendor with strong Eastern European engineering culture. |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Dedicated team |
Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Genuine embedded and firmware engineering depth that generalist giants on this list don't staff for. |
| + | 360° coverage from electronics through cloud and AI under one vendor. |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification, plus healthcare-specific delivery under IEC 62304 and FDA 21 CFR Part 820. |
| + | Direct partnership tiers with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip. |
| + | Full intellectual property and source code transfer on every engagement. |
| - | Not sized for a program that genuinely needs 500+ engineers staffed simultaneously across many parallel workstreams |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, only development and ongoing maintenance |
| - | Does not obtain regulatory certification on the client's behalf, only the technical documentation to support it |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded scale with audited financials, useful for enterprise procurement. |
| + | Built its reputation on Central and Eastern European engineering culture, a distinct positioning among the giants. |
| + | Consulting and engineering practices spanning cloud, data, and AI at real scale. |
| - | Global public-company scale means enterprise sales cycles and account structures suited to large budgets |
| - | Smaller total headcount than the India-anchored giants, which matters for the very largest programs |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a connected medical device that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built together.
Deep embedded and firmware engineering wrapped in a full cloud, data, and AI practice. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation & logistics.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: an enterprise wanting giant-scale delivery capacity without the traditional offshore-India model.
Publicly traded US scale built on a Central and Eastern European delivery model instead of the traditional offshore-India approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Travel.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A connected medical device that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built together. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An industrial IoT product needing MCU driver work and secure OTA firmware updates. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An enterprise wanting giant-scale delivery capacity without the traditional offshore-India model. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer that wants a publicly traded, audited vendor with strong Eastern European engineering culture. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. Deep embedded and firmware engineering wrapped in a full cloud, data, and AI practice.
EPAM Systems (4.3/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer that wants a publicly traded, audited vendor with strong Eastern European engineering culture. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than EPAM Systems?
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: genuine embedded and firmware engineering depth that generalist giants on this list don't staff for. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: publicly traded scale with audited financials, useful for enterprise procurement.
How do Lemberg Solutions and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses flexible engagement models: tech consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, or full project development, rather than one fixed template pricing. EPAM Systems uses enterprise consulting and dedicated-team engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or EPAM Systems?
EPAM Systems is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and EPAM Systems?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: deep embedded and firmware engineering wrapped in a full cloud, data, and AI practice. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: publicly traded US scale built on a Central and Eastern European delivery model instead of the traditional offshore-India approach. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 50,000+ globally; large Ukraine workforce), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Automotive vs Financial services, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.