DXC Technology vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.1/5) edges ahead of DXC Technology (3.9/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. DXC Technology is the stronger option for enterprises with legacy mainframe or infrastructure outsourcing needs. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
DXC Technology vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | DXC Technology | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2017 | 2000 |
| HQ | Ashburn, Virginia, USA | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 125,000+ | 11,300+ |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Decades of inherited enterprise IT history from its HPE Enterprise Services and CSC predecessor companies | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms |
| Pricing model | Enterprise managed-services and outsourcing engagements | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS, Azure, Mainframe modernization | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Insurance, Financial services, Public sector, Manufacturing | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail |
DXC Technology vs Endava: overview
DXC Technology
DXC Technology came into existence on April 3, 2017 through the merger of Hewlett Packard Enterprise's Enterprise Services division with Computer Sciences Corporation, inheriting decades of enterprise IT history from both predecessor companies despite its own young formal founding date. Headquartered in Ashburn, Virginia, it employs roughly 125,000 people delivering IT outsourcing, application services, and cloud modernization for large enterprises. That merger history means DXC's institutional knowledge runs deeper than its 2017 incorporation date suggests, though it also inherited legacy contracts and technical debt that a newer competitor wouldn't carry.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
Services and capabilities: DXC Technology vs Endava
| Capability | DXC Technology | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI/ML development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Custom software development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: DXC Technology vs Endava
| Framework / platform | DXC Technology | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| SAP | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: DXC Technology vs Endava
| Criterion | DXC Technology | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Managed services, Consulting, Dedicated team | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: DXC Technology vs Endava
| Dimension | DXC Technology | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Insurance, Financial services, Public sector | Payments, Banking, Insurance |
| Best use cases | A large enterprise with legacy mainframe systems needing modernization support., An insurance or public-sector organization wanting an established infrastructure outsourcing partner. | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. |
| Typical project type | Managed services | Dedicated team |
DXC Technology vs Endava: pros and cons
| DXC Technology | |
|---|---|
| + | Decades of inherited enterprise IT expertise from its HPE Enterprise Services and CSC lineage. |
| + | 125,000-person delivery capacity for large infrastructure and application outsourcing. |
| + | Established insurance and public-sector practices. |
| - | Inherited legacy contracts and technical debt from its predecessor companies |
| - | Less associated with modern digital engineering practices than some newer competitors |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
Who should choose DXC Technology?
A typical fit: a large enterprise with legacy mainframe systems needing modernization support.
Decades of inherited enterprise IT history from its HPE Enterprise Services and CSC predecessor companies. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Insurance, Financial services, Public sector, Manufacturing.
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Decision matrix: DXC Technology vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | DXC Technology |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: DXC Technology (Not published) vs Endava (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | DXC Technology |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | DXC Technology |
Use case fit: DXC Technology vs Endava
| Use case | DXC Technology fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A large enterprise with legacy mainframe systems needing modernization support. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An insurance or public-sector organization wanting an established infrastructure outsourcing partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: DXC Technology vs Endava
Endava (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms.
DXC Technology (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need an insurance or public-sector organization wanting an established infrastructure outsourcing partner. If your situation matches that, DXC Technology is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
DXC Technology vs Endava FAQ
Is DXC Technology better than Endava?
Endava (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. DXC Technology's strongest advantage: decades of inherited enterprise IT expertise from its HPE Enterprise Services and CSC lineage. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale.
How do DXC Technology and Endava differ in pricing?
DXC Technology uses enterprise managed-services and outsourcing engagements pricing. Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: DXC Technology or Endava?
DXC Technology is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between DXC Technology and Endava?
DXC Technology's primary differentiator is: decades of inherited enterprise IT history from its HPE Enterprise Services and CSC predecessor companies. Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. They also differ in team size (125,000+ vs 11,300+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Insurance, Financial services vs Payments, Banking).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.