Endava vs Coherent Solutions: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.1/5) edges ahead of Coherent Solutions (3.9/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. Coherent Solutions is the stronger option for mid-market buyers wanting a US-headquartered generalist without giant-scale overhead. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Coherent Solutions: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Coherent Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 1995 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 2,200+ |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms | Three decades of mid-market delivery history without mega-giant account layers |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | React, AWS, Salesforce |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Financial services, Healthcare, Manufacturing |
Endava vs Coherent Solutions: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
Coherent Solutions
Coherent Solutions was founded in 1995 and is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, with roughly 2,200 employees running development offices across North America and Europe. Its practice spans software engineering, product design, AI, cloud, data analytics, and Salesforce consulting, positioning it as a generalist mid-market alternative to both the mega-giants and the smaller boutique firms on this list. Three decades of operation give it a mature delivery process without the account-management layers of a much larger organization.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Coherent Solutions
| Capability | Endava | Coherent Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI/ML development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Coherent Solutions
| Framework / platform | Endava | Coherent Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Coherent Solutions
| Criterion | Endava | Coherent Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Coherent Solutions
| Dimension | Endava | Coherent Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Financial services, Healthcare, Manufacturing |
| Best use cases | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | A mid-market US company wanting a domestic vendor without enterprise-giant overhead., A buyer needing combined product design and engineering from one team. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Coherent Solutions: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
| Coherent Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Three decades of continuous operation since 1995. |
| + | US headquarters simplifies contracting for North American buyers. |
| + | Broad practice spanning engineering, design, AI, and Salesforce consulting. |
| - | Much smaller delivery capacity than the mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | No single named technical specialty beyond general full-stack and Salesforce work |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Coherent Solutions?
A typical fit: a mid-market US company wanting a domestic vendor without enterprise-giant overhead.
Three decades of mid-market delivery history without mega-giant account layers. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Coherent Solutions
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Coherent Solutions (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Coherent Solutions
| Use case | Endava fit | Coherent Solutions fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A mid-market US company wanting a domestic vendor without enterprise-giant overhead. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer needing combined product design and engineering from one team. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Coherent Solutions
Endava (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms.
Coherent Solutions (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer needing combined product design and engineering from one team. If your situation matches that, Coherent Solutions is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Coherent Solutions FAQ
Is Endava better than Coherent Solutions?
Endava (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. Coherent Solutions's strongest advantage: three decades of continuous operation since 1995.
How do Endava and Coherent Solutions differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Coherent Solutions uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Coherent Solutions?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Coherent Solutions?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Coherent Solutions's primary differentiator is: three decades of mid-market delivery history without mega-giant account layers. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 2,200+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.