Endava vs Grid Dynamics: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.1/5) edges ahead of Grid Dynamics (4.0/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. Grid Dynamics is the stronger option for retail and technology enterprises wanting publicly listed, multi-region nearshore delivery. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Grid Dynamics: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Grid Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2006 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | San Ramon, California, USA (NASDAQ: GDYN) |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 4,300+ |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms | A publicly listed vendor with delivery deliberately spread across Eastern Europe, Central Europe, and Latin America |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | React, AWS, GCP |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Retail, Technology, Financial services |
Endava vs Grid Dynamics: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
Grid Dynamics
Grid Dynamics was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in San Ramon, California, trading on NASDAQ under the ticker GDYN with roughly 4,300 employees. Its delivery model spans Eastern Europe, Central Europe, and Latin America rather than concentrating in one region, and its practice focuses on enterprise digital engineering for retail, technology, and finance clients specifically. That multi-region nearshore structure is a real differentiator from single-country delivery models, though its total headcount is a fraction of the mega-giants on this list.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Grid Dynamics
| Capability | Endava | Grid Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI/ML development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Grid Dynamics
| Framework / platform | Endava | Grid Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Grid Dynamics
| Criterion | Endava | Grid Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Grid Dynamics
| Dimension | Endava | Grid Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Retail, Technology, Financial services |
| Best use cases | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | A retail or technology enterprise wanting a publicly listed, multi-region nearshore partner., A buyer specifically wanting delivery risk spread across three geographic regions. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Grid Dynamics: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
| Grid Dynamics | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on NASDAQ, giving financial transparency at a mid-market scale. |
| + | Delivery deliberately spread across three regions rather than concentrated in one country. |
| + | Named enterprise digital engineering practices for retail and technology clients. |
| - | Much smaller total capacity than the mega-giants for very large, multi-year programs |
| - | Retail and technology focus adds less differentiated value outside those verticals |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Grid Dynamics?
A typical fit: a retail or technology enterprise wanting a publicly listed, multi-region nearshore partner.
A publicly listed vendor with delivery deliberately spread across Eastern Europe, Central Europe, and Latin America. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Technology, Financial services.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Grid Dynamics
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Grid Dynamics (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Grid Dynamics
| Use case | Endava fit | Grid Dynamics fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A retail or technology enterprise wanting a publicly listed, multi-region nearshore partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer specifically wanting delivery risk spread across three geographic regions. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Grid Dynamics
Endava (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms.
Grid Dynamics (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer specifically wanting delivery risk spread across three geographic regions. If your situation matches that, Grid Dynamics is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Grid Dynamics FAQ
Is Endava better than Grid Dynamics?
Endava (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. Grid Dynamics's strongest advantage: publicly listed on NASDAQ, giving financial transparency at a mid-market scale.
How do Endava and Grid Dynamics differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Grid Dynamics uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Grid Dynamics?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Grid Dynamics?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Grid Dynamics's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed vendor with delivery deliberately spread across Eastern Europe, Central Europe, and Latin America. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 4,300+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Retail, Technology).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.