Endava vs Thoughtworks: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Thoughtworks (4.2/5) edges ahead of Endava (4.1/5) overall. Thoughtworks is the better choice for enterprises wanting agile and continuous-delivery practice leadership over raw headcount. Endava is the stronger option for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Thoughtworks: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Thoughtworks |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 1993 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Chicago, Illinois, USA |
| Team size | 11,300+ | ~10,000 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms | A technical thought-leadership reputation built on shaping agile and continuous-delivery practices industry-wide |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | React, AWS, Kubernetes |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Financial services, Retail, Media |
Endava vs Thoughtworks: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
Thoughtworks
Thoughtworks was founded in 1993 and now runs roughly 10,000 employees across 49 offices in 18 countries from its Chicago headquarters, with a reputation built less on headcount than on technical influence: its consultants and open-source tools helped popularize agile development and continuous delivery practices used industry-wide today. That thought-leadership reputation is a genuine differentiator from the mega-giants on this list, most of whom are known for delivery capacity rather than technical practice innovation. Its mid-size scale means less capacity for the very largest programs but closer access to senior technical talent.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Thoughtworks
| Capability | Endava | Thoughtworks |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI/ML development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Thoughtworks
| Framework / platform | Endava | Thoughtworks |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Thoughtworks
| Criterion | Endava | Thoughtworks |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Thoughtworks
| Dimension | Endava | Thoughtworks |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Enterprise |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Financial services, Retail, Media |
| Best use cases | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | An enterprise wanting to adopt modern agile and continuous-delivery engineering practices., A buyer that values technical thought leadership over sheer headcount. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Thoughtworks: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
| Thoughtworks | |
|---|---|
| + | Technical thought-leadership reputation, having helped shape agile and continuous-delivery practices industry-wide. |
| + | Mid-size scale gives closer access to senior technical consultants than a mega-giant. |
| + | Offices in 18 countries provide real geographic delivery flexibility. |
| - | Much smaller total capacity than Accenture or TCS for the very largest enterprise programs |
| - | Premium technical-consulting pricing relative to some peers of similar size |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Thoughtworks?
A typical fit: an enterprise wanting to adopt modern agile and continuous-delivery engineering practices.
A technical thought-leadership reputation built on shaping agile and continuous-delivery practices industry-wide. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Media.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Thoughtworks
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Thoughtworks (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Thoughtworks |
Use case fit: Endava vs Thoughtworks
| Use case | Endava fit | Thoughtworks fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An enterprise wanting to adopt modern agile and continuous-delivery engineering practices. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer that values technical thought leadership over sheer headcount. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Thoughtworks
Thoughtworks (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. A technical thought-leadership reputation built on shaping agile and continuous-delivery practices industry-wide.
Endava (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. If your situation matches that, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Thoughtworks FAQ
Is Endava better than Thoughtworks?
Thoughtworks (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. Thoughtworks's strongest advantage: technical thought-leadership reputation, having helped shape agile and continuous-delivery practices industry-wide.
How do Endava and Thoughtworks differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Thoughtworks uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Thoughtworks?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Thoughtworks?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Thoughtworks's primary differentiator is: a technical thought-leadership reputation built on shaping agile and continuous-delivery practices industry-wide. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs ~10,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Financial services, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.