Endava vs Yalantis: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.1/5) edges ahead of Yalantis (3.8/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. Yalantis is the stronger option for regulated healthtech and IoT product companies wanting compliance-literate specialists. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Yalantis: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2008 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Warsaw, Poland (Dnipro-founded) |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 201–500 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms | A compliance-focused healthcare and IoT specialization, narrower and more regulatory-literate than the generalist giants |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | React Native, Node.js, AWS |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech |
Endava vs Yalantis: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
Yalantis
Compliant healthcare and IoT product engineering, work regulated enough that a generalist giant rarely prioritizes it, is Yalantis's actual focus, run by a 201-500 person team since the company's 2008 founding in Dnipro (corporate headquarters have since moved to Warsaw). That specialization is a real advantage for a buyer building a medical device or connected-health product; it's simply irrelevant to a buyer needing broad multi-industry capacity, which is exactly what the giants on this list are built for instead. The Warsaw relocation means Ukraine-headquartered status specifically should not be assumed.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Yalantis
| Capability | Endava | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| AI/ML development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Yalantis
| Framework / platform | Endava | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Yalantis
| Criterion | Endava | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Yalantis
| Dimension | Endava | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech |
| Best use cases | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | A healthtech company needing HIPAA- or MDR-aware compliant software development., An IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Yalantis: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
| Yalantis | |
|---|---|
| + | Visible healthcare-compliance and IoT specialization backed by public case studies. |
| + | Mid-size team large enough for real product programs, still founder-accessible. |
| + | Warsaw headquarters gives an EU corporate entity for buyers who want that structure. |
| - | Headquarters relocated from Ukraine to Poland, so this is not a Ukraine-domiciled vendor today |
| - | Far too small a team for a program needing mega-giant multi-industry capacity |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Yalantis?
A typical fit: a healthtech company needing HIPAA- or MDR-aware compliant software development.
A compliance-focused healthcare and IoT specialization, narrower and more regulatory-literate than the generalist giants. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Yalantis
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Yalantis (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Yalantis
| Use case | Endava fit | Yalantis fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A healthtech company needing HIPAA- or MDR-aware compliant software development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Yalantis
Endava (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms.
Yalantis (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need an IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. If your situation matches that, Yalantis is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Yalantis FAQ
Is Endava better than Yalantis?
Endava (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. Yalantis's strongest advantage: visible healthcare-compliance and IoT specialization backed by public case studies.
How do Endava and Yalantis differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Yalantis uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Yalantis?
Yalantis is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Yalantis?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Yalantis's primary differentiator is: a compliance-focused healthcare and IoT specialization, narrower and more regulatory-literate than the generalist giants. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 201–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Healthcare, Logistics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.