Globant vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Globant (4.2/5) edges ahead of Endava (4.1/5) overall. Globant is the better choice for enterprises wanting design-led digital product engineering at scale. Endava is the stronger option for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Globant vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Globant | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2003 | 2000 |
| HQ | Luxembourg City, Luxembourg (Buenos Aires-founded) | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 28,700+ | 11,300+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Design-forward digital product engineering reputation, distinct from the enterprise-systems focus of the mega-giants | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | React, AWS, AI/ML platforms | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Retail, Media & entertainment, Financial services, Gaming | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail |
Globant vs Endava: overview
Globant
Four founders, Martín Migoya, Guibert Englebienne, Martín Umaran, and Néstor Nocetti, started Globant in Buenos Aires in 2003; the company now runs nearly 29,000 employees from a Luxembourg corporate headquarters, a structure common among Latin American firms that later list internationally. Its reputation centers on design-led digital product engineering rather than traditional enterprise IT outsourcing, with named studios for AI, gaming, and digital commerce work. That design-forward positioning is a real differentiator from the mega-giants on this list, most of whom lead with enterprise systems integration instead.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
Services and capabilities: Globant vs Endava
| Capability | Globant | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✗ | ✓ |
| AI/ML development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Globant vs Endava
| Framework / platform | Globant | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Globant vs Endava
| Criterion | Globant | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Globant vs Endava
| Dimension | Globant | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Retail, Media & entertainment, Financial services | Payments, Banking, Insurance |
| Best use cases | An enterprise wanting a design-led digital product studio rather than a traditional systems integrator., A media, gaming, or retail brand needing large-scale digital product engineering. | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Globant vs Endava: pros and cons
| Globant | |
|---|---|
| + | Design-forward digital product engineering reputation, distinct from traditional enterprise IT outsourcing. |
| + | Named studio practices in AI, gaming, and digital commerce. |
| + | Nearly 29,000 employees, giving real capacity for large digital product programs. |
| - | Less depth in traditional enterprise systems integration than Accenture, TCS, or Capgemini |
| - | Luxembourg holding structure is a step removed from its original Buenos Aires engineering base |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
Who should choose Globant?
A typical fit: an enterprise wanting a design-led digital product studio rather than a traditional systems integrator.
Design-forward digital product engineering reputation, distinct from the enterprise-systems focus of the mega-giants. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Media & entertainment, Financial services, Gaming.
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Decision matrix: Globant vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Globant |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Globant |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Globant (Not published) vs Endava (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Globant |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Globant vs Endava
| Use case | Globant fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| An enterprise wanting a design-led digital product studio rather than a traditional systems integrator. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A media, gaming, or retail brand needing large-scale digital product engineering. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Globant vs Endava
Globant (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. Design-forward digital product engineering reputation, distinct from the enterprise-systems focus of the mega-giants.
Endava (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. If your situation matches that, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Globant vs Endava FAQ
Is Globant better than Endava?
Globant (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Globant's strongest advantage: design-forward digital product engineering reputation, distinct from traditional enterprise IT outsourcing. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale.
How do Globant and Endava differ in pricing?
Globant uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Globant or Endava?
Globant is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Globant and Endava?
Globant's primary differentiator is: design-forward digital product engineering reputation, distinct from the enterprise-systems focus of the mega-giants. Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. They also differ in team size (28,700+ vs 11,300+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Retail, Media & entertainment vs Payments, Banking).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.