Tech Mahindra vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.1/5) edges ahead of Tech Mahindra (3.9/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. Tech Mahindra is the stronger option for telecom and network-services enterprises wanting BT Group-rooted expertise. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Tech Mahindra vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Tech Mahindra | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1986 | 2000 |
| HQ | Pune, India | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 148,000+ | 11,300+ |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Telecom-sector depth traceable to its origins as a BT Group joint venture | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms |
| Pricing model | Enterprise consulting and managed-services engagements | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS, Azure, Network/telecom platforms | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Telecom, Manufacturing, Banking, Retail | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail |
Tech Mahindra vs Endava: overview
Tech Mahindra
Tech Mahindra was formed on October 24, 1986 as a joint venture between Mahindra & Mahindra and BT Group, and has grown into a standalone IT services company of more than 148,000 employees headquartered in Pune. Telecom remains a visible strength given its BT Group origins, alongside broader enterprise digital transformation, cloud, and network services work. Being part of the larger Mahindra Group conglomerate gives it access to cross-industry relationships an independent firm wouldn't have.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
Services and capabilities: Tech Mahindra vs Endava
| Capability | Tech Mahindra | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI/ML development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Custom software development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Tech Mahindra vs Endava
| Framework / platform | Tech Mahindra | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Tech Mahindra vs Endava
| Criterion | Tech Mahindra | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Dedicated team, Managed services | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Tech Mahindra vs Endava
| Dimension | Tech Mahindra | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Telecom, Manufacturing, Banking | Payments, Banking, Insurance |
| Best use cases | A telecom operator needing network transformation or digital services at scale., A large enterprise wanting Mahindra Group cross-industry relationships behind its vendor. | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Dedicated team |
Tech Mahindra vs Endava: pros and cons
| Tech Mahindra | |
|---|---|
| + | Genuine telecom and network-services depth from its BT Group joint-venture origins. |
| + | Backed by the larger Mahindra Group conglomerate. |
| + | Established enterprise digital transformation practice. |
| - | Telecom-sector strength is less relevant to a buyer outside that industry |
| - | Same enterprise-scale process overhead as its larger Indian IT-giant peers |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
Who should choose Tech Mahindra?
A typical fit: a telecom operator needing network transformation or digital services at scale.
Telecom-sector depth traceable to its origins as a BT Group joint venture. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Telecom, Manufacturing, Banking, Retail.
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Decision matrix: Tech Mahindra vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Tech Mahindra |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Tech Mahindra (Not published) vs Endava (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Tech Mahindra |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Tech Mahindra vs Endava
| Use case | Tech Mahindra fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A telecom operator needing network transformation or digital services at scale. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A large enterprise wanting Mahindra Group cross-industry relationships behind its vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Tech Mahindra vs Endava
Endava (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms.
Tech Mahindra (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need a large enterprise wanting Mahindra Group cross-industry relationships behind its vendor. If your situation matches that, Tech Mahindra is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Tech Mahindra vs Endava FAQ
Is Tech Mahindra better than Endava?
Endava (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Tech Mahindra's strongest advantage: genuine telecom and network-services depth from its BT Group joint-venture origins. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale.
How do Tech Mahindra and Endava differ in pricing?
Tech Mahindra uses enterprise consulting and managed-services engagements pricing. Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Tech Mahindra or Endava?
Tech Mahindra is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Tech Mahindra and Endava?
Tech Mahindra's primary differentiator is: telecom-sector depth traceable to its origins as a BT Group joint venture. Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. They also differ in team size (148,000+ vs 11,300+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Telecom, Manufacturing vs Payments, Banking).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.